Видео

Mi padre sufrió pues no pudo trabajar desde su sufrido accidente. Al menos pudo ganar esta demanda y con ese dinerito vivir parte de su vida. QDP. Sr.DOMINGUEZ

During friendly merger talks, the parties involved typically share confidential information with one another under the expectation act that it will be kept confidential & used only to evaluate the merger. But what happens if a party were to user this information to attempt a later hostile 68 A.3d 1208 (2012) takeover? Martin Marietta Materials and Vulcan Materials were the two largest companies in the construction-aggregates industry. In April of 2010 the 2 companies began merger talks to keep their talks confidential. Vulcan Lands, Inc. v. Currie Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One December 21, 2023, Filed D082234 98 Cal. App. 5th 113 *; 316 Cal. Rptr. 3d 494 **; 2023 Cal. App. LEXIS 980 ***; 2023 WL

This case is like money always wins.

it’s so embarrassing that we couldn’t marry who we loved until 2015

So equal protection didn’t apply to Mexican Americans. And if Greg Abbott along with criminal Ken Paxton want to reverse today’s laws back to early Juan Crow Laws

When I first saw the title, I started to laugh because I figured some snowflake demanded equal rights with same sex relationships. But after listening to you,it makes sense.

Catastrophe management was a farce company to work for

At first I thought it was Orlando City until you showed that his last name is Orlando 😂.

I was required to attend use of force training for my security job and a instructor who was in law enforcement stated that a Terry stop extends to private security.I didn't agree and I stated that our "Powers of arrest" manual specifically states that we private security can search for weapons incidental to an arrest. Again I don't agree unless things have changed?

Linda Brown had to travel a mile everyday to get to her non-white school even though she lived nearby a white school, the browns attempted to enroll Linda at the white school but were turned away as were several other African-american families. In brown v. Board of Education a group of 13 parents including Linda's dad Oliver sued the topeka school board on behalf of their 20 children in Federal district court alleging that segregation deprived them of equal protection of the laws. National Gay Task Force v. Board of Education_ 729 F.2d...

Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States 424 U.S. 800 (1976) divined one of rare situations under which a Federal court will differ to a state court jurisdiction under the abstraction doctrine. In 1969 Colorado enacted a waters right determination & administration act to set up legal procedures for determining claims to water rights, this act divided the state to 7 water divisions corresponding to water drainage basins. United States v. Walker River Irrigation Dist._ 473 F. ...

This video saved my final project for my government class, thank you

Quoting George Carlin… the Republicans want live babies, so they can turn them into dead soldiers

Can a state pass a law to keep 4 people out? This was the question in Edwards v. California 314 U.S. 160 (1941) In December 1939 Fred Edwards drove from his home in Marysville California to spur Texas, Edwards picked up his brother-in-law Frank Duncan along with his wife and newborn baby and drove them to California. Duncan was poor & unemployed so the family stayed with Edwards for 10 days... Edwards v. Superior Court of California of County of Alameda, 159 Cal. 710, 115 P. 649, 1911 Cal. LEXIS 372

Can you appeal the US supreme Court under your hearing

However most misinterpret that quote to mean that the judiciary was the sole and exclusive arbiter on the matter when no such sentiment was expressed at any point in the case

This makes numerous factual errors right from the beginning.

This video was actually so helpful thank you, I didn’t feel like watching a 30 minute video just to know what evidence there was

Was the district court judge correct to suppress the communications made between Defendant-Appellee and his wife, relying on the privilege for spousal communications? Was the district court judge correct to suppress the communications made between Defendant-Appellee and Sullivan, relying on the attorney-client privilege? Held: Yes; the communications at issue were privileged under the spousal privilege and were not subject to any exception; therefore the district court judge was correct to order them suppressed. Yes; the communications at issue were privileged under the attorney-client privilege and not subject to any exception; therefore the district court judge was correct to order them suppressed.

What a terrible interpretation of the 2nd amendment and not what the founders intended. Does any other amendment have an "introductory" clause. No. Why? Because they made it up to justify their personal opinions on guns. Blatantly going against the original purpose of the amendment

This is fire 🔥

Why would Hamer appeal if she won the trial? I’m missing something.

Gangbangers & armed robbers get convicted of this all the time.

Why is Hand Unit teaching me about historical events 💀

Its generally true that evidence during an unconstitutional search is inadmissible under the 4th amendment exclusionary rule, but what about evidence that was first noticed during an unlawful search? Don't they train these officers of the law? But, later seized during a 2nd search pursuant to a warrant obrained without reliance on the information learned during the 1st search.Murray v. United States, 487 U.S. 533, 108 S. Ct. 2529, 101 L. Ed. 2d 472, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 2881, 56 U.S.L.W. 4801

Arizona is a schmitt -hole

Negligent conduct often leads to civil liability but it can also lead to criminal liability as explained in state vs. Larson -Mark Larson and his friend Nicholas Claire and Len Morgan spent several hours drinking in bars then in the early morning hours, the trio got into Larson's truck and he drove them down a remote country road going about 20 miles per hour over the speed limit. Larson drifted onto the right shoulder and over corrected into the left ditch no one was wearing a seat belt so all three were ejected. Larson v. Dep_t of State_ 565 F.3d 857

The Supreme court has established various tests to determine whether government action involving religion violates The Establishment clause: typically the test applied depends on the type of government action at issue. Larson vs. Valente explains the type of government action 456 U.S. 228 (1982) that triggers strict scrutiny, a Minnesota statute required charitable organizations to register with the Minnesota Department of Commerce and report their annual income & costs, the statue Exempted religious organizations from these requirements if over 1/2 of their contributions came from their members rather than the public. Larson v. Dep_t of State_ 565 F.3d 857

How about instead of forcing women to give birth we force men to have a vasectomy which by the way it's reversible 😏 "snit it or skip it" ladies ,lets start a movement!🎊🎉🎊

I love how these videos end just before we find out who won😁😁

damn handunit still educating us

Do you think that's where you should put out limited editions. And only allow like so many so you can see what the repercussions of everything else is going to show up as

andy fields what are you doing here-

So what they do change the engine coverage Lansing

Looks like a big con

Who would have guessed Charles Kuwaklt had been burning so many ends of the rope in his RV?

I can make 2d animation

I can make these type of video

why is a guy online saying the kid won?

Thank you Quimbee

You guys need to do a better job explaining the actual SCOTUS ruling and its ramifications, which is what really matters

This case isnt talked about much on RUclips but it is very important. Thank you

Bedbug furniture

Was gonna like but you cut it off

Advertisers use all sorts of techniques to catch an audience's eye and keep its attention often they use drama and humor to encourage interest in the product but what happens if a viewer takes the silliness seriously? The federal court in New York City addressed that question in the 19...88 F. Supp.2d 116(19..) the case of Leonard vs. PepsiCo. Campos-Lopez v. Konieg_ 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202549

A daring helicopter escape from prison 622 F. Supp. 1083 United States v. Lopez hoes thorny question about aider & a better liability in United States v. Lopez. After disappearing from Federal Custody Ronald McIntosh landed a helicopter in the prisons recreation yard where his girlfriend Samatha Lopez was being held. 10 days after their blockbuster worthy getaway this stargust pair was arrested, while buying wedding rings in a mall...Campos-Lopez v. Konieg_ 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202549

A lot of mfs in these comments are trying so hard to seem like yall know what you talking about with the balenciaga pedo shit lmao im not even defending them but some of these comments sound pretentious 😂😂

BUT WHAT DID THE SUPREME COURT DOOOOO?????

I love how this videos just keep confirming my hate for Scalia

A rundown of the Supreme Court opinion and dissention would have been helpful. I have just as many questions now as I did before I watched the video.